|
Excerpt:
...Since 1972, when Roger Cardinal selected the title
‘Outsider Art’ for his ground-breaking book on Art Brut,
the English term has taken on a life of its own. More
popular than anyone could have imagined 30 years ago,
Outsider Art has also been the subject of increasing
conflict. ‘Term warfare’ is the tongue in cheek phrase
used to refer to the endless quibbling that afflicts
the genre, not just with regard to terminology but,
more seriously, regarding definitions. As Outsider Art
grows more successful commercially, the question of
who qualifies for membership in the club is no longer
merely academic. And while many fear that the pressures
of the market place will compromise the essential purity
of the art, the market place ultimately cares less about
purity than it does about quality. For better or for
worse, the field of Outsider Art is evolving: it is
bound to be very different five years from now.
Outsider Art has attracted a particularly broad following
in the United States, largely because it tallies with
that nation’s egalitarian ideals and appeals to Americans’
view of themselves as maverick individualists.
|
Americans have been no more successful in coming up
with a universally accepted definition of Outsider Art
than Jean Dubuffet was in defining Art Brut, but they
have so far managed to avoid the factionalism that has
been common in Europe. American Outsider Art is far
broader in its purview than Art Brut, and includes a
range of works that in Europe would generally be classified
as ‘naïve’ or ‘folk’ art. Indeed, while this loosely
circumscribed category of art has won numerous American
fans, the term ‘Outsider Art’ itself has been criticized
for being too Eurocentric and judgmental. After all,
in an ostensibly democratic country, there should be
no outsiders, and critics have pointed out that some
so-called outsiders (especially African Americans) were
in fact very much part of their own communities, albeit
ostracized by white society. That is why American scholars
often revert to the more neutral, if also not entirely
adequate, term ‘self-taught.’
|