|
Excerpt:
...The debate over what to call the kind of art that
is found in Raw Vision has been going on for decades
now, and sometimes we seem to be farther from resolving
this knotty issue than ever.
As the whatchamacallit field grows in recognition and
popularity, its old-timers continually find themselves
contending with new arrivals who think that work exhibited
under the ‘visionary’ label must reflect some kind of
mental illness, or who want to call themselves ‘outsider
artists’ because they never got around to completing
their art degree.
|
Meanwhile, more and more writers, academics, and art
types are discovering this niche, proclaiming the new-to-them
descriptive inadequacies of terms such as ‘folk,’ ‘self-taught,’
and ‘outsider,’ and condemning the arrogance or pointlessness
of a field that presumes to embrace material as disparate
as embroidery by Swiss schizophrenics and wood carvings
by Jamaicans. (I sympathize, since not long ago I was
doing pretty much the same thing myself.)
|