Raw Vision Magazine
  HOME
  LATEST ISSUE
  SUBSCRIPTIONS
  RENEWALS
  GIFT SUBS
  ONLINE SUBS
  BACK COPIES
  A-Z INDEX
  BOOKS
  SOURCEBOOK
  RAWVISION 123
  GALLERIES
  ARTISTS
  ORGANISATIONS
  ADVERTISING
  what is
RAW VISION?
  what is
OUTSIDER ART?
  AWARDS
  abcd ARTISTS
  ENVIRONMENTS
  NEK CHAND
  NEWS
  WHAT'S ON
  OBITUARIES
  EVENTS
  BIBLIOGRAPHY
  ART FOR SALE
  LINKS
  sell
RAW VISION
  CONTACT
 
  Raw Vision    
 

Outsider Biographies vs. Outsider Art

Tessa DeCarlo addresses important new questions in the ongoing outsider debate

Raw Vision #41

ORDER NOW

Excerpt:
...The debate over what to call the kind of art that is found in Raw Vision has been going on for decades now, and sometimes we seem to be farther from resolving this knotty issue than ever.

As the whatchamacallit field grows in recognition and popularity, its old-timers continually find themselves contending with new arrivals who think that work exhibited under the ‘visionary’ label must reflect some kind of mental illness, or who want to call themselves ‘outsider artists’ because they never got around to completing their art degree.


Meanwhile, more and more writers, academics, and art types are discovering this niche, proclaiming the new-to-them descriptive inadequacies of terms such as ‘folk,’ ‘self-taught,’ and ‘outsider,’ and condemning the arrogance or pointlessness of a field that presumes to embrace material as disparate as embroidery by Swiss schizophrenics and wood carvings by Jamaicans. (I sympathize, since not long ago I was doing pretty much the same thing myself.)

 
Earth is Being WatchedUntitled
Howard Finster, Earth is Being Watched, 1980, 21.25 x 26.5 inches, courtesy Phyllis Kind Gallery, New York (left); Chris Johanson, Untitled, 2001, 9 x 12 inches, courtesy Jack Hanley Gallery, San Francisco (right)
 
Raw Vision #41 cover

For more text and images,
see Raw Vision
issue #41


Subscribe Now! Books Back Copies

Up