|
Excerpt:
...Art and madness have such a long history, going all
the way back to Plato's ideas about the different forms
of mania (one of which would today be called poetic
inspiration), that their association seems necessary
and inevitable. Artistic creativity, since the Renaissance
at least, has a long tradition of being linked to extremes
of passion and eccentricity and hence seen as dangerously
close to a madness once thought to have a passionate
basis. With modern psychiatry and the medicalisation
of madness, a certain class of art-work has emerged,
tying these strands together: 'psychotic art', work
of remarkable artistic power created by patients designated
as mad.
|
Psychotic art satisfies several fantasies about art
and madness simultaneously. It appears as something
like the (il)logical conclusion to all that is most
wayward and idiosyncratic about artistic creativity,
an image of how originality can go over the top or over
the edge: at once a warning and a challenge. But it
has also been seen from the other side, as offering
a window into what would otherwise be inaccessible:
its extraordinary images seeming to give on to the private
worlds of delusion, hallucination or delirium.
|