|
Excerpt:
...Within each of us there is a strong desire to possess
a space of our own; a personal environment that gives
expression to the person we feel ourselves to be. Unmistakably,
our material surroundings do reveal a good deal about
who we are, even when the architectural setting in which
we dwell is imposed, and the objects we bring to it
are store-bought and commonly available. However, even
in the rare instance where a wealthy individual is able
to participate in the design of his own house, and to
assemble a personal and unique collection of possessions,
it is doubtful that the space and forms which he is
able to create really provide much possibility of access
to his inner world. Architecture has always been the
most tradition bound of the arts, reflecting society
more than the individual, class more than psychology.
The objects we acquire usually seem to embody the person
we wish to be, rather than any deeper truth, revealing
commonly held ideals of the social, educational, and
cultural group to which we belong.
|
It can be argued that the inability to create a truly
personal environment is the result of our failure to
achieve real identity, and that historically the situation
has never been markedly different. What would it take
to break the bounds of imposed tradition, and of acquired
necessities of class and culture? What unique kinds
of space and form would be called into existence if
our inner being were allowed to dictate our external
surroundings?
|